Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29033 WP No. 1878 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1878 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. A.V.RAVI, S/O LATE A.N.VENKATASWAMY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, NO.36/37, DUBASI PALYA, R.V.C.E. POST, MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 059. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANDRANATH ARIGA K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BENGALURU CITY, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
3.
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KENGERI POLICE STATION, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29033 WP No. 1878 of 2019 KENGERI, BENGALURU - 560 060. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MANJUNATH RAYAPPA, AGA FOR R2 AND R3;
SMT.POONAM PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO FORBER THE RESPONDENTS, THEIR MEN AND ANYONE CLAIMING UNDER THEM FROM CARRYING OUT ANY FURTHER WORK ON THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER
This petition raises the question with regard to the alleged illegal claim by the respondents over immovable property, which petitioner claim to have purchased in terms of deed of sale dated 18.02.1999.
2. Since the issue pertaining to the civil rights of the parties and in respect of immovable property, involving complex questions of facts have been raised, this Court do not
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29033 WP No. 1878 of 2019 deem it appropriate to go into the same under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3. At this juncture, counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for sometime, seeks liberty to avail such remedy as may be permissible under the law before the competent court of civil jurisdiction. However, he submit there was an interim protection granted by this court and the same be extended till the petitioner seeks such interim relief before the competent court.
4. Submission placed on record.
5. Interim order granted by the court is extended for a period of sixty days enabling the petitioner to seek appropriate interim relief before court of competent jurisdiction.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4