APHC010324772018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14826/2018 Between: 1. BANTUMILLI SUBBA RAO, S/O. RAMADASU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O PAMULAVARI GUDEM, H/O TIRNAMPALAM VILLAGE, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. 2. JONNAKUTI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. J.VEERA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O THIRNAMPALEM VILLAGE, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SHAIK SYED BAJI SAHEB,, S/O. SHAIK SYED, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O DWARAKA TIRUMALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. DAVULURI KUTUMBA RAO,, S/O.PAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O THIRNAMPALEM VILLAGE, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. VUTUKURI LAKSHMAIAH,, S/O. PEDA PENTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O THIRNAMPALEM VILLAGE, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. A.N.V.S.LAKSHMI,, D/O. LATE TADIKALAPUDI SIVA RAMA KRISHNA, W/O. ADAVI VIGHNA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O RAYANAPALEM, PEDAVEGI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) 2 AND 1. STATE OF A P, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ELURU REVENUE DIVISION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDARCUMMANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DWARAKA TIRUMALA POLICE STATION, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. PAVULURI NEHRU, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABT 50 YRS, OCC. FARMER, R/O.THIRNAMPALEM(V), DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. ROKKAM DURGAIAH, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED ABT 45 YRS, OCC. FARMER, R/O.THIRNAMPALEM(V), DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. NAMBURI SATYANARAYANA, S/O.N.PENTAIAH, AGED ABT 50 YEARS, R/ O.PAVULURIVARIGUDAM VILLAGE, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. OGIRALA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O.SAHADEVUDU, AGED ABT. 65 YEARS, R/ O. PAVULURIVARIGUDAM VILLAGE, DWARAKA TIRUMALA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in issuing the impugned proceedings in M.C.No.3 / 2018 dated 29.01.2018 under Section 145 of Cr.P.C as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the Article 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court and consequently quash the same and pass 3 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant an Order of restraint restraining the unofficial Respondents No.6 to 9 from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners over the subject property Admn Ac.8-64 Cents bearing R.S No.37-1B of Tirumalampalem Village, Dwaraka Tirumala Mandal, West Godavari pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in M.C.No.3/2018 dated.29.01.2018 of the 4th respondent issued under section 145 of Cr.P.C, pending disposal of the writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K R KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 3. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 4 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri K. Tarun Ganesh Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri K.R. Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS 5 200 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14826/2018 Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS