Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21851 (KAR)

BHAGYA K V v. S JAYAPAL

MFA/4144/2021 · 2026-06-17

Jayant Banerji, Tara Vitasta Ganju

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29563-DB MFA No. 4144 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4144 OF 2021 (MV-I) BETWEEN: BHAGYA K. V. D/O LATE VASU, W/O MAHADEVA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT CROSS NO.39, SANJEEVININAGAR 8TH CROSS, BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE – 560 072. PRESENTLY AT NO.209, MANGANAHALLI CROSS, ULLALA MAIN ROAD BANGALORE – 560 056 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. G.V. MANJUNATHA., ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND: 1. S. JAYAPAL S/O K. SRINIVASAN, MAJOR, OWNER, R/AT NO.36/1, E-STREET, 1ST MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 023. Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29563-DB MFA No. 4144 of 2021 2. SHIVANANDA C S/O CHIKKANNA, MAJOR, DRIVER, R/AT NO.15, 1ST CROSS, ASHWATHANAGAR, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 053. 3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE NO.109, SSI AREA, V BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE PIN – 560 010. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16.03.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO.2086/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT, XVIII ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU CITY (SCCH-4), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MFA COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) When the matter was listed on 08.06.2026, the following order was passed: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29563-DB MFA No. 4144 of 2021 “None appears for the appellant. List this matter for dismissal on 16.06.2026.” 2. On 16.06.2026, the matter was again listed and the following order was passed: “This case was to be listed for ‘Dismissal’ in view of the previous Order passed by this Court. However, it has not been listed for dismissal. An explanation be submitted during the course of the day. List this matter for Dismissal on 17.06.2026.” 3. Today, no one appeared for the appellant. The appeal is being listed for dismissal and is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE BMV* List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1