BOPPANA SEETHA RAMAYYA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/4769/2022 · 2026-02-08
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21846 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21846 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010322532022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4769/2022 Between:
1.BOPPANA SEETHA RAMAYYA, S/O. VENKAIAH AGED 91 YEARS R/O. REDDIPUDI VILLAGE, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT.
2.KAMBHAMPATI KASHI VISHALAKSHI, W/O. MOHANDAS AGED 48 YEARS, RIO. REDDIPUDI VILLAGE, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT.
3.KAMBHAMPATI MOHANDASU, S/O. RAM MOHANRAO AGED 56 YEARS, R/O. REDDIPUDI VILLAGE, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT.
4.KAMBHAMPATI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. RAM MOHANARAO AGED 46 YEARS, R/O. REDDIPUDI VILLAGE, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 2.BOPPANA SOUJANYA, D/O. IMMANI DURGA RAO AGED 40 YEARS, APPALARAJU GOODEM VILLAGE, T NARASAPURAM MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
2 1.ARUN SHOWRI G Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.MADHAVA RAO NALLURI 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been laid in C.C.No.1703 of 2022 on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chintalapudi. Considering that four years have elapsed since the filing of the chargesheet and the Petitioners have not sought amendment of the prayer, it appears that the Petitioners are either not interested in prosecuting the matter or that the parties may have arrived at a settlement before the learned Trial Court. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.02.2026
3 VTS