IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26492 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-427 Year-2024 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Amarjeet Kumar son of Hiralal Sahani Resident of Village -Shahpur Khurd, P.S.- Goraul (Kathara), District- Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sudha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 01-07-2026 Heard the parties. 2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Sakra Town P.S. Case No. 427 of 2024. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 23.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17844 of 2025 which reads as under:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sakra Town P.S. Case No. 427 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 109 and 309(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 and 37 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the other accused persons are accused of committing loot from the informant. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26492 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 2/2 While committing loot they fired at the informant but the firing hit the co-accused. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. The petitioner has been named in the self-inculpatry statement of the co- accused Ashish Kumar @ Badal. Co-accused Vijay Kumar has also named the petitioner. He is in custody since 23.11.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the criminal antecedent of similar nature of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. 7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby rejected. 3. Considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to review its earlier order. 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U