Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21839 (AP)

ARJI SUBRAHMANYAM, TADEPALLIGUDEM v. PONNAGANTI VARALAKSHMI, KRISHNA DIST & ANOTHER

CRP/5852/2015 · 2026-02-10

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010321632015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5852/2015 Between: 1. ARJI SUBRAHMANYAM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, S/O. PENTAYYA, OCC: STOVE REPAIRTS, R/O. D.NO. 5-12-6, 9TH WARD, KOTHAPALLI STREET, TADEPALLIGUDEM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PONNAGANTI VARALAKSHMI KRISHNA DIST ANOTHER, W/O. BHASKARA RAO, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 7-28, KOMMAYYATHOPU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, VZA 2. AKULA DHANALAKSHMI, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. SBI COLONY, SAIKIRAN APARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ZA JCJ ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. UTTARA LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G VEERENDRA NADH BABU The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: Sri B.Sudhakar Kumar, learned Counsel representing M/s. Uttara Legal for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. 2. Having so recorded, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:11.02.2026 Vns 3 268 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5852/2015 Date: 11.02.2026 Vns