1 of 3 1028-WP.9545.2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1028 WRIT PETITION NO. 9545 OF 2023 BHAUSAHEB BABURAO LABHADE AND ANOTHER VERSUS PRAMILA JOHN JADHAV AND OTHERS ... Mr. Ajinkya Kale h/f. M/s. Talekar & Associates, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Vasant Digambarrao Salunke, Advocate for Respondent No.5. ... WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9547 OF 2023 BHAUSAHEB BABURAO LABHADE AND ANOTHER VERSUS PRAMILA JOHN JADHAV AND OTHERS … Mr. Ajinkya Kale h/f. M/s. Talekar & Associates, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Vasant Digambarrao Salunke, Advocate for Respondent No.5. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 8th JANUARY, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties. 2. In Writ Petition No.9545 of 2023, the Petitioners are assailing the common order dated 12.01.2023 passed below Exhibit 5 and Exhibit 20 by learned C.J.S.D., Kopargaon in R.C.S. No.186 of 2021, whereby application for grant of temporary injunction filed by the Petitioners came to be rejected. The said order was confirmed by the 2026:BHC-AUG:764 2 of 3 1028-WP.9545.2023 order dated 10.07.2023 passed below Exhibit 40 by District Judge-1, Kopargaon in M.C.A. No.10 of 2023. Whereas, in Writ Petition No.9547 of 2023, the Petitioners are assailing the common order dated 25.07.2023 passed below Exhibit 33 and Exhibit 42 by learned C.J.J.D., Kopargaon in R.C.S. No.186 of 2021, whereby police aid was granted to Respondent Nos.1 to 5. 3. At the outset, both the learned Advocates submitted that this Court, by its order dated 03.08.2023, directed the parties to maintain status quo. It is further submitted that the suits are of the years 2021 and 2022, namely R.C.S. No.186 of 2021 and R.C.S. No.177 of 2022. Both the learned Advocates submitted that the ends of justice would be met if the Trial Court is directed to decide both the suits within a stipulated period, while continuing the order passed by this Court. 4. In view thereof, without going into the merits of the matter, I am inclined to dispose of the present petitions by directing the Trial Court to decide both the suits within a period of one year from today. The Trial Court shall decide the suits on their own merits and in accordance with law. 5. The interim order granted by this Court shall continue to operate till the Trial Court decides the suits. The interim relief is continued only because it was in operation during the pendency of the 3 of 3 1028-WP.9545.2023 proceedings. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not recorded any findings nor examined the merits of the matter. 7. Therefore, the present petitions are disposed of. 8. All the issues are kept open. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef