- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28901 WP No. 58475 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION No. 58475 OF 2013 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.R. MUNIKRISHNAPPA, S/O LATE RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT K. G. CHIKKABALLA VILLAGE, JANGAMKOTE HOBLI, SIDALAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI KALYAN R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101. 3. THE SHEIRESTEDAR, TALUK OFFICE, SIDALAGHATTA-562105. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, SIDALGHATTA TALUK, SIDALGHATTA-562105. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28901 WP No. 58475 of 2013 5. M. NARAYANASWAMY, S/O LATE MUNICHIKKANNA, R/AT ARASANAHALLI VILLAGE, SULIBELE HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK-562114. 6. G. N. SATHYANARAYANARAO, S/O J K NARASIMHAMURTHY, AGED MAJOR, 7. KURIGALA MUNIYAPPA, S/O MALLAPPA, AGED MAJOR, 8. SANJEEV RAJ, S/O MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED MAJOR, RESPONDENT No.6 TO 8 ARE R/AT JANGAMKOTE VILLAGE, JANGAMKOTE HOBLI, SIDALAGHATTA TALUK-562105. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI K. SHIVASHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5; WP STANDS DISMISSED, VIDE ORDER DT 11.4.2023 R6 & R8; R7- ABATES, VIDE ORDER DATED 04.04.2019) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26.07.2013 IN R.A.No.40/2009-10 PASSED BY THE DY. COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLAPURA DIST., CHIKKABALLAPURA VIDE ANNEXURE-A TO THE W.P. & CONSEQUENTLY TO QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.3.2009 IN R.A. (SHI) 405/2008- 09 PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28901 WP No. 58475 of 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner assailing order dated 26.07.2013 in R.A. No.40/2009-10 passed by respondent No.1 at Annexure-A and order dated 16.03.2009 in R.A.(Shi) 405/2008-09 passed by respondent No.2 at Annexure-B to the writ petition. 4. On careful consideration of the writ papers would indicate that mutation has been made by the respondent authorities based on the registered Sale Deed dated 16.09.1957. 5. In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that no interference is called for in this petition, as both the authorities have confirmed the order passed by the respondent No.4, the entry made in the mutation register is based on the registered Sale Deed dated 16.09.1957. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28901 WP No. 58475 of 2013 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49