Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21829 (ORI)

SAROJINI PRADHAN v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/18523/2026 · 2026-06-24

B P Routray

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.18523 of 2026 Sarojini Pradhan …. Petitioner Ms. A. Tripathy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha, represented through its Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management Department and Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. T.K. Dash, AGA CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 24.6.2026 Order No. 01. 1. Heard Ms. A. Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T.K. Dash, learned AGA for State – opposite parties. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the Petitioner that the Tahasildar, Banarpal (O.P. No.3), is proceeding for her eviction without granting any opportunity of hearing and by issuance of notice without due process of law. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Tahasildar, Banarpal (O.P. No.3) to grant due opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner before proceeding for her eviction and take decision, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition. Till such decision is taken by Opposite Party No.3, the petitioner may not be evicted from the case land. 4. An urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K.Panda