Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21829 (CHH)

SMT. POORNIMA UPADHYAY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4440/2026 · 2026-06-16

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24475 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4440 of 2026 Smt. Poornima Upadhyay W/o Shri Shaahank Upadhyay, Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As Supervisor In The Office Of District Programme Officer, Women And Child Developnent Department, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary,women And Child Development Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar , District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Under Secretary, Women And Child Development Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar , District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director, ,women And Child Development Department Mantralaya Indrawati Bhawan Nava Raipur Atal Nagar , District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Programme Officer, Women And Child Development Department Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.J.K. Rao, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru Order on Board RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.06.18 10:18:39 +0530 2 17/06/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the State, referring to the affidavit dated 16/06/2026, submits that the competent authority has already considered the case of the petitioner and a proposal in this regard has been prepared on 11/06/2026, which has been filed as Annexure D/2. He further undertakes that necessary orders for posting of the petitioner, as indicated in paragraph 8 of the affidavit dated 16/06/2026 and in terms of the proposal dated 11/06/2026, shall be issued within a period of five days. 2. The aforesaid undertaking is taken on record. 3. In view of the statement and undertaking made by learned counsel for the State, nothing further survives for consideration in the present petition. 4. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of with the expectation that the respondents shall comply with the undertaking within the aforesaid period. 5. It is made clear that in the event the undertaking is not complied with, it shall be open to the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available in accordance with law. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Rahul