Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2182 (DEL)

AMIT KUMAR v. BAL KISHAN

CM(M)/86/2026 · 2026-04-10

Rajneesh Kumar Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~29 and 30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 86/2026 & CM APPL. 2203/2026 AMIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Anand, Mr. Gunjan Bansal and Mr. Tarun Choudhary, Advs. (through VC) versus BAL KISHAN .....Respondent Through: None. 30. + CM(M) 92/2026 & CM APPL. 2282/2026 SH AMIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Anand, Mr. Gunjan Bansal and Mr. Tarun Choudhary, Advs. (through VC) versus SH RAJIV SURI .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R % 10.04.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the present petitions have become infructuous. Therefore, he prays that the present petitions may be disposed of as withdrawn. 3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 11:16:45 petitioner, the present petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J APRIL 10, 2026/sds/isk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2026 at 11:16:45