1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1153 of 2026 Decided on: 03.09.2026 ________________________________________________ Ajay Kumar & Ors. ....Petitioners Versus Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Dhiman …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Advocate. For the respondent : Ms Archana Negi, Deputy Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 21.08.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioners was considered and rejected vide order dated 20.08.2026. 2. In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to assail order dated 20.08.2026, in accordance with law, if they are still aggrieved. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 3rd September, 2026 Judge (raman)