Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21814 (KAR)

SRI.V.NAGARAJU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/16067/2025 · 2026-06-10

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27725 WP NO.16067 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16067 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. V. NAGARAJU S/O LATE PATEL VENKATEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT BALAGHATTA VILLAGE, MELUKOTE HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 401. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PANDAVAPURA SUB-DIVISION PANDAVAPURA - 571 434. 4. THE TAHASILDHAR PANDAVAPURA TALUK, PANDAVAPURA - 571 434. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27725 WP NO.16067 OF 2025 5. SRI. N. RAJEGOWDA S/O KULLARI SINGEGOWDA. 6. SMT. BETTAMMA W/O LATE MOGANNEGOWDA. 7. SRI. NARASIMHAGOWDA S/O LATE MOGANNEGOWDA. 8. SRI. VENKATEGOWDA S/O LATE MOGANNEGOWDA. RESPONDENTS 5 TO 8 ARE R/AT BALAGHATTA VILLAGE, MELUKOTE HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA - 571 434. 9. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE PUTTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. 10. SRI. YOGESHA GOWDA S/O LATE PUTTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 9 AND 10 ARE R/AT ROOM NO.6, VILLAGE ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.J. ESWARAPPA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. K.R. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR R5 TO R10) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 04TH FEBRUARY, 2025 PASSED IN R.P.NO.43/2025 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA VIDE ANNEXURE-K, AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE REVISION PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 02ND JANUARY, 2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3- - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27725 WP NO.16067 OF 2025 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, PANDAVAPURA SUB-DIVISION, PANDAVAPURA VIDE ANNEXURE-J; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 04th February, 205 (Annexure-K) passed by the respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner in R.P. No.43/2025; inter alia sought for allowing the Revision Petition by setting aside the Endorsement dated 02nd January, 2025 (Annexure-J) issued by the respondent No.3-Assistant Commissioner. 2. Heard Sri. Srinivas V., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; Sri. B.J. Eswarappa, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 4; and Sri. K.R. Nagaraja, learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 to 10. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the impugned order dated 04th February, 2025 (Annexure-K) passed by the respondent No.2 in R.P. No.43/2025, the same would indicate - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27725 WP NO.16067 OF 2025 that, notice has not been issued to the respondents in the Revision petition before the respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner and also records have not been called for from the respondent No.3-Assistant Commissioner. In that view of the matter, I find force in the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the impugned order passed by the respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner in Revision Petition is required to be quashed and matter be remitted back to the respondent No.2 for fresh consideration. Accordingly, I pass the following: O R D E R (i) Writ Petition allowed; (ii) Order dated 04th February, 2025 (Annexure-K) passed by the respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner in R.P. No.43/2025 is hereby set-aside; and matter is remitted back to the respondent No.2 with a direction to reconsider the issue afresh and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the parties and by considering the original records secured from the respondent No.3; - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27725 WP NO.16067 OF 2025 (iii) Since the parties are representing through their respective counsels, in order to avoid further delay in the matter, parties are directed to appear before the respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner on 13th July, 2026 at 03.00 p.m.; (iv) The respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner is directed to complete the proceedings within an period of six months from the date of appearance of the parties. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5