IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 571 of 2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 Bir Singh ...Petitioner Versus Mohar Singh ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. Kiran Kumar Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral) Case called again. In compliance to the order of even date, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a receipt dated 03.09.2026, regarding the deposit of ₹10,875/-, which is 7.5% of the cheque amount of ₹1,45,000/- issued by the Member Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent under instructions, submits that the complainant/respondent does not 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 want to proceed further with the complaint in view of the compromise effected between the parties. 3. In view of above, present revision petition is allowed and the judgment passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 86 of 2023, decided on 29.04.2024 (learned Appellate Court) affirming the judgment of conviction dated 06.09.2023 and order of sentence dated 11.09.2023, passed by Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Manali, District Kullu, H.P. in Case Registration No. 55 of 2021 are ordered to be set aside and the complaint is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no amount has been deposited before the learned Courts below or before the Registry of this Court, hence, no order is required to be passed regarding the disbursal of the amount. 5. The petitioner is stated to be in judicial custody and he is presently lodged in Model Central Jail, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P. He is ordered to be released forthwith, if not required in any other case. Release warrants be prepared accordingly and the same be sent to the Jail Superintendent, Model Central Jail Nahan, 3 District Sirmaur, H.P. and learned Trial Court through FASTER forthwith for necessary compliance. 6. In view of the above, the present revision is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 3rd September, 2026. (ravinder) Digitally signed by RAVINDER KUMAR DN: C=IN, O=HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA, Phone=35ecb6f93c6891a7dae90f163e34d7ecaa420b13af1363204ab0e 0f5c87077dc, PostalCode=171001, S=Himachal Pradesh, SERIALNUMBER=f6cc63c55495d14ce1f8623eacdb6cb9ef2c553803537 a2f53c4ee637cbebaff, CN=RAVINDER KUMAR Reason: I am the author of this document Location: Date: 2026-09-03 13:36:01 RAVINDER KUMAR