1 30-wp 6687-2016+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6687 OF 2016 Trimurti Shikshan Prasarak Mandal’s Trimurti Institute Of Pharmacy Through Its Authorized Person Sunil Pandit Patil .. Petitioner Versus The All India Council For Technical Education, New Delhi And Others .. Respondents Mr. Ashwin V. Hon, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S. P. Joshi, AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. Mr. S. S. Jadhavar, Advocate for Respondent No. 5. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 6689 OF 2016 Shiva Trust’s Rajeshbhaiyaa Tope College of Pharmacy Through its President Dr. Balasaheb Shivajirao Pawar .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra And Others .. Respondents Mr. Ashwin V. Hon, Advocate for Petitioner. Smt. Jayshri P. Reddy, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Sumit Agrawal, Advocate for Respondent No. 4. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 6690 OF 2016 Seva Shikshan Prasarak Mandal’s 1 of 3 2026:BHC-AUG:1398-DB 2 30-wp 6687-2016+.odt Dr. N. J. Paulbudhe College of Pharmacy (Diploma), Through its President Shri Vinay Nath Paulbudhe .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra And Others .. Respondents Mr. Ashwin V. Hon, Advocate for Petitioner. Smt. Jayshri P. Reddy, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. AND WRIT PETITION NO. 6691 OF 2016 Omkar Bahuuddeshiya Vikas Sanstha’s Prof. Ravindra Nikam College of Pharmacy Through its President Ravindra Onkar Nikam .. Petitioner Versus The All India Council For Technical Education, New Delhi And Others .. Respondents Mr. Ashwin V. Hon, Advocate for Petitioner. Smt. Jayshri P. Reddy, AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ. DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2026. PER COURT :- 1. The learned advocate for the petitioner informs that, now the issue involved in these petitions is already settled. It is held that, the pharmacy council has the supremacy over AICTE so far 2 of 3 3 30-wp 6687-2016+.odt as pharmaceutical colleges and process are concerned. He submits that, now the pharmacy council has already regularized the admissions for the courses for the year 2016-2017. In view of that, he submits that the petitions have become infructuous. 2. In view of the same, the writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. ) P.S.B. 3 of 3