( 2026:HHC:37532 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.961 of 2026 Date of decision: 03.09.2026 Sunpark Boutique and Spa ….Petitioner Versus Rajesh Agarwal & Ors. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Amrit, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.3 & 4. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, has placed on record communication dated 01.09.2026, wherein it has been stated as under:- “The Committee noted that as the procedure prescribed under the guidelines for processing of applications for registration purpose has not been completed and as the mandatory eligibility 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2. ( 2026:HHC:37532 ) requirements stipulated under Clause 7.3 of the Scheme Notification, as reproduced in Part-C of the Minutes, is not being fulfilled the unit, prima facie, is not found eligible. Moreover, in the absence of any budgetary allocation under the Scheme, the application cannot be granted registration.” 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, it is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under the law. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge September 03, 2026 (reena)