Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21803 (AP)

N.PRABHAVATHI v. Sri Poonam Malakondaiah

CC/1149/2018 · 2026-03-15

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010316992018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1149/2018 Between: 1. N.PRABHAVATHI, ANM, O/O URBAN HEALTH CENTER, SWARNABHARATHI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. K APPAYAMMA, ANM, O/O URBAN HEALTH CENTER, SWARNABHARATHI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. K M L KUMARI, ANM, O/O URBAN HEALTH CENTER, SWARNABHARATHI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI POONAM MALAKONDAIAH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HELATH, MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE (E2) DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI POONAM MALAKONDIAH, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AP., DM AND HS CAMPUS, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. 3. SRI RAMESH, DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRCIT. 4. SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 5. SRI D S N MURTHI, M/S DHANUSH INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED 1- 8-448, LAKSHMI BUILDING 6TH FLOOR, SP ROAD, BEGUMPET, SECUNERABAD- 500003 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for willfully and deliberately disobeying the interim orders dated 21.04.2017 passed in W.P.No.33721 of 2016 under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and pass orders. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PRAKASH BUDDARAPU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. B NARAYANA REDDY 2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1149 of 2018 ORDER:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Prakash Buddarapu, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submit that the order dated 21.04.2017 has been complied partially. However, the main writ petition is pending. The petitioners are inclined to pursue their remedies in the main writ petition. 2. By recording the said submission, the contempt petition is closed. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 16.03.2026 RMR 4 115 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1149 of 2018 16.03.2026 W RMR