Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21799 (KAR)

ABHISHEK @ CHANDRA @ KALLA ABHI @ KULLA ABHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.A/1438/2023 · 2026-06-15

S Rachaiah

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28769 CRL.A No. 1438 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1438 OF 2023 (U/S 14(A) (2)) BETWEEN: ABHISHEK @ CHANDRA @ KALLA ABHI @ KULLA ABHI S/O SHIVASHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/AT WHOLESALE BAR TOWN, GANGADONAHALLI, BENGALURU – 560 034. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRATHEEP K C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY RAJAGOPALANAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU. REP BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE – 560 001. Digitally signed by SUSHMA LAKSHMI B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28769 CRL.A No. 1438 of 2023 2. SMT. SITAMMA W/O NARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.193/1, 5TH CROSS, KASTURI LAYOUT, RAJAGOPALNAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 079. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M V ANOOPKUMAR., HCGP FOR R1) ---- THIS CRL.A FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 25.03.2023 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE LXX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE AND SPL. JUDGE AT BENGALURU AND ENLARGE THE APPELLANTS ON BAIL IN CR.NO.6/2021 (SPL.CASE.NO.646/2021) FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 307, 302, 504, 120-B, 201 R/W 149 OF IPC AND SEC.3(2)(v) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT AND SEC.25(1)(b) R/W 4 OF INDIAN ARMS ACT BY RESPONDENT P.S., BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28769 CRL.A No. 1438 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeks leave of the Court to withdraw of the appeal. 2. The said memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of disposal of the appeal, IA.No.1/2023 filed for condonation of delay does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the same is disposed off. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1