Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21797 (PNJ)

PARMINDER SINGH VIRDI AND ORS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CWP/17045/2026 · 2026-05-27

Namit Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-17045-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Parminder Singh Virdi & others State of Punjab & others CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR, J. 1. Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to 2. their grievances, the petitioners have also served notice/representation which is still pending consideration. He further submits that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfie respondents to consider and decide the said legal notice, by passing a speaking order, in a time bound manner. 3. 4. accepts notice on behalf of the respondents innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Parminder Singh Virdi & others Versus State of Punjab & others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Parvesh K. Saini, Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj & Mr. Budhadev Maity, Advocates, for the petitioners. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularize their services Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for their grievances, the petitioners have also served notice/representation dated 18.02.2026 (Annexure P which is still pending consideration. He further submits that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the said legal notice, by passing a speaking order, in a time bound manner. Notice of motion. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab ce on behalf of the respondents-State. He has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17045-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2026 ...Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Parvesh K. Saini, Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj & Mr. Budhadev for the petitioners. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus regularize their services. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for redressal of their grievances, the petitioners have also served demand (Annexure P-16) to the respondents, which is still pending consideration. He further submits that at this stage, the d, if appropriate directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the said legal notice, by passing a Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, State. He has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus redressal of demand ) to the respondents, which is still pending consideration. He further submits that at this stage, the d, if appropriate directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the said legal notice, by passing a , who is present in Court, State. He has no objection to the VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.27 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-17045-2026 (O&M) 5. through the record of the case. 6. present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. consider and decide (Annexure P speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, preferably within a period of copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereon shall be conveyed to the petitioners. 27.05.2026 Vimal 2026 (O&M) (2) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case. Without going into the merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. consider and decide demand notice/representation dated 18.02.2026 (Annexure P-16) submitted by the petitioners expeditiously, by passing a order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, preferably within a period of 04 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereon shall be conveyed to the petitioners. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.6 to demand notice/representation dated 18.02.2026 submitted by the petitioners expeditiously, by passing a order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereon shall be conveyed to (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Yes/No I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone merits of the case at this stage, the to demand notice/representation dated 18.02.2026 submitted by the petitioners expeditiously, by passing a order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereon shall be conveyed to VIMAL KUMAR 2026.05.27 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.