- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28873 WP No. 12293 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 12293 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. GURURAJ HATWAR @ T.L. GURURAJ HATWAR AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O LATE T. LAXMINARAYANA HATWAR, R/O MALYADI, THEKKATTE VILLAGE AND POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576231 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 201. 3. SMT. PRATHIMA SHANBHOGUE, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, D/O GIRIDHARA PRABHU, R/O DOOR NO.4-33, VIJAYLAXMI NILAYA, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28873 WP No. 12293 of 2026 THEKKATTE VILLAGE AND POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. 576231 4. SRI. MAHESH HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O VISHWANATH HEGDE R/AT 'SAMRUDHI NILAYA' NO. 1-184, THEKKATTE VILLAGE AND POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576231 5. SRI. SUKUMARA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, S/O K.B SHIVARAM SHETTY, R/AT, 'RATHNASHREE NILAYA' NO.1-123-1, THEKKATTE VILLAGE AND POST, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576231 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UDNER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) QUASHING THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 25-02-2026 NO. Bhu.S.Ni./PatraNo./95/2025-26 ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, KUNDAPURA (RESPONDENT NO.2) PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A HERETO AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28873 WP No. 12293 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. In this petition, petitioner is assailing the endorsement dated 25.02.2026 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.2. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and finding recorded by respondent No.2 at Annexure-A would indicates that the rights of the parties is yet to be crystallized in RSA No.1154/2024 before this Court. 4. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, no interference is called for at this stage and it is open for the petitioner herein to approach respondent No.2 after the conclusion of the proceedings referred to above. 5. With these observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28