STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR v. PRAMOD SADASHIV PATIL
CA/10736/2005 · 2026-01-13
Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21793 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21793 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
ca349.04 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1123 OF 2002 State of Maharashtra And Anr VERSUS Pramod Sadashiv Patil ... A.G.P. for Applicant : Mr. D.J. Patil Advocate for Respondents : Mr. A.G.Talhar ….. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10735 OF 2005 IN FA/1123/2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 349 OF 2004 IN FA/1123/2002 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 316 OF 2004 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 319 OF 2004 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10736 OF 2005 IN FA/1123/2002 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 311 OF 2004 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 309 OF 2004 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 310 OF 2004 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 318 OF 2004 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 317 OF 2004 …..
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : 13th JANUARY, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. The civil application Nos. 349 of 2004, 10735 of 2005 and
ca349.04 -2- 10736 of 2005 are filed seeking grant of time of two weeks for submitting the enquiry report to this Court as to how the amount of compensation was paid to the claimants, even before filing of the appeals. Learned A.G.P. submitted that the enquiry report has already been filed and, therefore, the applications have become infructuous and deserve to be disposed of.
2. In view of the submission of learned A.G.P., the applications are disposed of as infructuous.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/