$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010073492021 + W.P.(C) 1011/2021, CM APPL. 31795/2026 RAMESH NAGAR BANDER WALI KHUI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Upadhayay, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advs. (9811538050) versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rachita Garg, Adv. for GNCTD (7838066417) Mr. Mukesh Gupta, standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Raghav Gupta, Adv. (7011795811) Mr. Amit Kumar, Ms.Khushboo Sharma and Mr. Kartik, Advs. for R5 (83769 29395) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 12.10.2026 W.P.(C) 1011/2021 1. This Court finds that the respondent no.4/ MCD in its Status Report filed on 12.05.2026 has categorically stated as under: “9. That in response to the show cause notice dated 23.03.2026, a reply dated 27.03.2026 from Sh. Mandeep Singh has been received and the noticee attached copy of instant License dated 25.03.2026 (which is issued to the online portal of Central Licensing and Enforcement Cell, HQ/MCD). Thereafter, examining the reply of Sh. Mandeep Singh the owner/occupier of the property no. J-39, Bander Wali Khui, Ramesh Nagar, New Delhi, a sealing order vide This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:49:53 no. 1247/DC/KBZ/2026 dated 29.04.2026 was passed in respect of the suit property. 10. That in pursuance of the sealing order dated 29.04.2026, sealing action has been taken on 04.05.2025 in the presence of PS Kirti Nagar, Delhi and the suit property was sealed. Copy of the show cause notice dated 23.03.2026 and sealing order dated 29.04.2026 is annexed herewith as Annexure-B & Annexure-C.” 2. Considering the aforesaid, learned counsel for the MCD submits that since the main reliefs sought by the petitioner in the present petition stand satisfied, there is nothing remaining therein. 3. In fact, learned counsel for the petitioner, supporting the said submissions made by learned counsel for the MCD, also seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. 4. As such, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. However, before parting this Court deems it apposite to observe that the petitioner herein has not disclosed anything regarding the pending proceedings inter se the parties and/ or involving the same subject premises. CM APPL. 31795/2026 6. In view of the aforesaid order, the present application whereby the respondent no.5 seeks dismissal of the captioned petition being infructuous, is liable to be disposed of. 7. As such, the present application is disposed of. SAURABH BANERJEE, J OCTOBER 12, 2026/So This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:49:53