Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21787 (JHR)

BISHNU PRASAD SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND REPRESENTED THROUGH THE COLLECTOR CUM D.C. DHANBAD

C.M.P./755/2026 · 2026-07-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:21991 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.755 of 2026 ------ Bishnu Prasad Shaw, aged about 55 years, son of Late Lakhan Saw, resident of H.E. School Road Vistipara (Hirapur), P.O. & P.S. & District-Dhanbad. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand represented through the Collector-cum- D.C. Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District-Dhanbad. 2. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Dhanbad, P.O, P.S. & District- Dhanbad. 3. Circle Officer (Dhanbad Anchal), P.O., & P.S. & District- Dhanbad. 4. Municipal Corporation Dhanbad, represented before the Court through Competent Autority/Executive Officer having its Office at Bank More Dhanbad, P.O., P.S. & District-Dhanbad. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manish Kumar, Sr.SC-II : Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, AC to Sr. SC-II ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-24-07-2026 Heard the parties. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of W.P.(C) No.4252 of 2018 to its original file which stood dismissed for default on 31.07.2025. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that W.P.(C) No.4252 of 2018 stood dismissed for default on 31.07.2025 by this Court. It is next submitted that due to circumstances beyond the control of the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner could not appear before this Court when the said W.P.(C) No.4252 of 2018 was called out, resulting in dismissal of the said W.P.(C) No.4252 of 2018 for default of the petitioner. It is next submitted that default of the petitioner before this Court on 31.07.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said W.P.(C) No.4252 of 2018 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the W.P.(C) No.4252 of 2018 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts and circumstances of this case, W.P.(C) No.4252 of 2018 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list W.P.(C) No.4252 of 2018 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 24/07/2026 Abhiraj/