Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21784 (JHR)

UDIL TOPPO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./2179/2026 · 2026-07-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:21989 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2179 of 2026 ------ Udil Toppo, aged about 40 years, son of Late Kishore Ekka, Resident of Putrangi, P.O.-Dumri, P.S.-Dumri, District-Gumla, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Partry ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shubham Mishra, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-24-07-2026 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of B.A. (Filing). No.3739 of 2026 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 15.05.2026. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that B.A. (Filing). No.3739 of 2026 stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 15.05.2026 for removing the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within four weeks. It is next submitted that because the counsel on record was out of station due to some medical emergency, hence, the petitioner could not remove the said defects within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said B.A. (Filing). No.3739 of 2026 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 15.05.2026. It is next submitted that non-compliance of peremptory order dated 15.05.2026 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said B.A. (Filing). No.3739 of 2026 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the B.A. (Filing). No.3739 of 2026 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, B.A. (Filing). No.3739 of 2026 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list B.A. (Filing). No.3739 of 2026 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 24/07/2026 Abhiraj/