1 2026:CGHC:24499 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4431 of 2021 1. Smt. Reeta Tiwari W/o Shsri Chandra Shekhar Tiwari Aged About 57 Years R/o Ward No. 1, Mahaveer Nagar, Vikas Nagar, Mangla, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2. Smt. Yasmin Khan D/o Late Ali Baksh Qureshi Aged About 55 Years R/o House No.50, Ring Road No. 2,babjee Park, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3. Smt. Archana Tiwari W/o Shri Anil Kumar Tiwari Aged About 39 Years R/o Shree Ram Parisar, Shanti Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.), Through Power of Attorney Holder Ramesh Kumar Dubey S/o Late S.P. Dubey, Aged About 65 Years, R/o J.P. Vihar Mangla, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (CG) 4. Ram Milan Tiwari S/o Late Shiv Kumar Tiwari Aged About 66 Years R/o Shree Ram Parisar, Shanti Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Union Of India Through Ministry Of Road, Surface Transport And Highways, Through Its Secretary, Transport Bhawan, 1 Sansad Marg, New Delhi -110001. 2. National Highway Authority, Through Its Project Director, National Highway Authority Bilaspur, Project Execution Unit, Abhilasha Parisar, Tifra, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3. Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4. Prescribed Officer -Cu, -Land Acquisition Officer (Sdo Revenue) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.06.18 10:49:04 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Vidya Bhushan Soni, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Sanchit Bhatt, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Dhiraj K Wankhede, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board 17/06/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respective respondents would submit that petitioner is having efficacious alternate remedy of filing appropriate application under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956. However, petitioner has directly filed writ petition before this Court. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy available to petitioner under the law for redressal of his grievance as raised in this writ petition. 3. In view of above submission of learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-