[2026:JHHC:21966] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4075 of 2026 Shahid Ansari @ Sajid Ansari @ Jahid Ansari, aged about 19 years, Son of Gulam Rasul, Resident of Village Bhabhandi, P.O.- Nawadih, P.S- Ramgarh Nagar, District- Palamau, Jharkhand. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : None. For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. ------ 07/ 24.07.2026 Nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Learned A.P.P for the State is present. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 64(1)/ 115(2)/ 191(2)/ 191(3)/351(2)/352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau. 3. It has been stated in para-2 of the petition that earlier the petitioner has moved before this court in A.B.A. No. 619 of 2026, which was later on dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to move before the learned court by way filing regular bail. It has further been averred in the petition that the petitioner has not committed any offence and what has happened that was due to love. On these grounds, the anticipatory bail has been prayed by the petition in the present petition. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that earlier the prayer for anticipatory bail of this petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to move before the learned court by way of filling regular bail and further no fresh [2026:JHHC:21966] -2- ground has been stated in the petition to entertain this third anticipatory bail application. 5. It transpires that when the court was not convinced, thereafter the petitioner has withdrawn A.B.A. No. 619 of 2026 with the liberty to move before the learned court by way filing the regular bail and further nothing new has been averred in this anticipatory bail petition to entertain this petition. 6. In view of the above, no fresh ground is made out to entertain this anticipatory bail application. As such, this petition is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-24.07.2026 Amitesh/-