- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28886 WP No. 13570 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 13570 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MYLARAPPA, S/O LATE MALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS OLD, 2. SRI RAJAPPA, S/O SRI MYLARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, BOTH PETITIONER NOS. 1 & 2 ARE R/AT BANTGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KAAMANAKERE POST, HERENALLURU HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577116. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. AISHWARYA HEGDE M.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT, CHIKKAMAGALURU - Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28886 WP No. 13570 of 2026 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TARIKERE SUB-DIVISION, TARIKERE, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577548. 4. TAHSILDAR, KADURTALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577548. 5. KARIYAPPA S/O BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O BANTAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HIRENALLUR HOBLI, KAMANAKERE POST, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577116. 6. SANNAMALAPPA S/O NINGAPPA, AGED MAJOR, R/O BANTAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HIRENALLUR HOBLI, KAMANAKERE POST, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577116. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1-R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 13.11.2025 PASSED BY RESPONDENT No.2 IN RP No.46/2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-M AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE ORDER DATED 02.02.2024 PASSED BY RESPONDENT No.3 IN RA No.26/22-23 AS PER ANNEXURE-K. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28886 WP No. 13570 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. In this petition, petitioners have challenged the entry made in M.R. No.19/1991-92 in favour of respondent No.5, which was based on the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.1637/1979 and the order passed by the Land Tribunal granting occupancy right in favour of respondent No.5. 3. In that view of the matter, since the entry made in favour of respondent No.5 is based on the order passed by the Land Tribunal and by this Court in W.P No.1637/1979, I am of the view that no interference is called for. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioners herein to approach the competent civil Court to establish their right over the property, in a manner known to law. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32