Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:24201-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 480 of 2026 1 - Uma Sarthi W/o Late Shyam Singh Sarthi Aged About 43 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Bhelwantikra, Block - Raigarh, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - Jayanti Patel W/o Shri Amit Kumar Patel Aged About 39 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Barliya, Block
-
Raigarh,
District
-
Raigarh
Chhattisgarh 3 - Sangeeta Nande W/o Shri Rajeev Nande Aged About 41 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Barliya, Block
-
Raigarh,
District
-
Raigarh
Chhattisgarh 4 - Gouri Shankar Chauhan S/o Shri Harishchandra Chauhan Aged About 49 Years Presently Posted As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Khadiyapara Tiur, Block - Kharsia, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - Fabiyola Kerketta D/o Shri Marshal Kerketta Aged About 62 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Govt. Primary School Jamgaon, Block - Raigarh, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - Ashok Kumar Kujur S/o Shri Benedict Kujur Aged About 53 Years ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2026.06.18 10:18:13 +0530
2 Presently Posted As Teacher At Govt. Middle School Tiur, Block - Kharsia, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh
... Appellants versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur
Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur,
District
-
Raipur
Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar
Naya
Raipur,
District
Raipur
Chhattisgarh 4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat Atal Nagar Naya
Raipur,
District
Raipur
Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 7 - Chief Executive Officer Janapad Panchayat, Raigarh, District Raigarh
Chhattisgarh 8 - Chief Executive Officer Janapad Panchayat, Kharsia, District Raigarh
Chhattisgarh 9 - Block Education Officer Block Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
3 10 - Block Education Officer Block Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellants : Mr. Devashish Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Prasun Kumar Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
, Judge
Judgment on Board Per
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
17.06.2026
1. Heard on I.A. No.01, which is an application for condonation of delay of 61 days in filing the instant appeal.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the appellants and considering the reasons mentioned in the application, we are of the considered opinion that sufficient cause has been shown in the application and accordingly, I.A. No.01 is allowed and delay of 61 days in filing the instant appeal is hereby condoned.
3. The appellants have filed this writ appeal against the order dated 24.11.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No.3923 of 2025 and other connected matters, by which the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the writ petitioners / appellants herein.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the issue involved in this writ appeal has already been considered and
4 decided by this Court vide judgment dated 13.03.2026 passed in WA No.193 of 2026 (Pushpalata Manikpuri & Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), wherein this Court held as under:-
“33. Upon perusing the impugned order, we notice that the same has been rendered by the learned Single Judge with cogent and justifiable reasons. In an intra-court appeal, no interference is usually warranted unless palpable infirmities are noticed. Learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition by the impugned order has adverted to all the facts of the case. We do not find any fault in the impugned order.
34. In view of the above, the writ appellants/petitioners
have
failed
to demonstrate that they are similarly situated to the petitioner in Writ Appeal No. 261/2023 (Smt. Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others). Their claim under the Circular dated 10.03.2017 is, therefore, misconceived, and the learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the writ petition. Accordingly, the present writ appeal is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed.” They further submitted that since the facts and issue involved in the present case is identical to that of WA No. 193 of 2026, this appeal may also be dismissed in the same terms.
5. Having considered the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, it
5 is evident that the facts and issue involved in this appeal is identical to WA No. 193 of 2026, this Court deems it appropriate not to take a view other than what has been taken in WA No. 193 of 2026.
6. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed in terms of the
order dated 13.03.2026 passed in WA No. 193 of 2026. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha)
Judge
Chief Justice Anu