Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2178 (RAJ)

SHIVCHARAN MEENA SON OF SAVANTA RAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2026/2026 · 2026-04-20

Uma Shanker Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16598] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2026/2026 1. Shivcharan Meena Son Of Savanta Ram Meena, Resident Of Piplabai Tehsil Bassi District Jaipur. 2. Ravi Son Of Shivcharan Meena, Resident Of Piplabai Tehsil Bassi District Jaipur. 3. Sunil Son Of Shivcharan Meena, Resident Of Piplabai Tehsil Bassi District Jaipur. 4. Mangli Wife Of Shivcharan Meena, Resident Of Piplabai Tehsil Bassi District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Ramprasad Meena Son Of Shri Mool Chand Meena, Resident Of Village Piplabai Bagdi Ki Dhani, Tehsil And Police Station Shivdaspura District Jaipur. 3. Bhori Wife Of Mool Chand Meena, Resident Of Village Piplabai Bagdi Ki Dhani, Tehsil And Police Station Shivdaspura District Jaipur 4. Sunita Wife Of Mukesh Meena, Resident Of Village Piplabai Bagdi Ki Dhani, Tehsil And Police Station Shivdaspura District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Sahu, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Lakhan Singh Meena, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 20/04/2026 ;g ;kfpdk /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk&f'konkliqjk] t;iqj 'kgj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k [2026:RJ-JP:16598] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2026/2026] 140@2026 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 115¼2½] 126¼2½] 189¼2½] 110 ch-,u-,l- dks fujLr djus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k rFkk fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh@ihfMr@vkgr }kjk la;qDr :i ls ;g fuosnu fd;k x;k fd i{kdkjksa ds chp esa vkilh LoSfPNd lgefr ds vk/kkj ij jkthukek gks pqdk gSA nksuksa i{kksa ds chp lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k gSa] vijk/k t?kU; o xaHkhj izd`fr dk ugha gS] vr% mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ o mlds vk/kkj ij lafLFkr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks vikLr fd;k tkosA fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk fof/k&lEer vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA muds }kjk rF;kRed fjiksVZ izLrqr dh x;h] ftlds lkFk iqfyl ds le{k vfHk;qDrx.k o vkgrx.k@ihfMr@ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr jkthukes dks rLnhd dj izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftls vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA orZeku ekeys esa vijk/k xaHkhj o t?kU; izd`fr dk ugha gSA i{kdkjku~ ds e/; lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k LFkkfir gks pqds gSa] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vuqla/kku vFkok vfHk;kstu dks fujUrj j[ks tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS] vr% ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fu.kZ; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. State of Punjab & Anr. 2012(10) SCC 303 esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj gksdj mijksDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ij ntZ vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk ;kphx.k ds fo:) iqfyl Fkkuk&f'konkliqjk] t;iqj 'kgj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 140@2026 dh lEiw.kZ dk;Zokgh dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Mittal /44