AJIT TIRKEY v. NABENDU MAHALI THE CHAIRMAN PURULIA MUNICIPALITY
CPAN/608/2024 · 2026-01-14
Amrita Sinha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2178 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2178 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
54 14.01.2026 Ct. No.18 pg.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
CPAN 608 of 2024 in WPA 24798 of 2023
Ajit Tirkey Vs. Nabendu Mahali
Mr. Debayan Ghosh
… For the petitioner
Mr. Nikhil Kumar Gupta
Ms. Soma Chakraborty
Mr. Subhadeep Maitra
… For the contemnor
1. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that no further instruction has been received from the petitioner.
2. According to the contemnor, the order passed by the Court has been complied with.
3. In view of the above, the Court is of the opinion that the contempt proceeding need not be proceeded any further.
4. The contempt application stands disposed of.
5. The direction of stopping of salary of the Finance Officer and the Executive Officer of the Purulia Municipality stands recalled.
6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)