ADITYA VAIBHAV SINGH @ ADITYA VAIBHAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3318/2026 · 2026-07-24
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21779 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21779 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:21971] -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3318 of 2026
Aditya Vaibhav Singh @ Aditya Vaibhav, aged about 21 years, son of Sanjeet Kumar Singh, resident of Village - Dariyapur, P.O.- Dariyapur, P.S.- Munger, District- Munger., Bihar: 811213.
..... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
..... … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the State
: Mrs. Priya Shrestha, A.P.P. (through V.C.) ------ 06/ 24.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State through V.C.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Petarwar P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 296, 318(2), 319(2), 351(1), 352, 356, 75, 77 and 79 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66(D) of I.T. Act, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be a student and has just passed the graduation examination and the petitioner has come into the contact of the husband of the informant, who happened to be the spiritual guru and certain incriminating has been found by this petitioner during that contact and due to that only certain comments have been made by this petitioner on the Facebook. He next submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-11 of the petition. He further submits that no case of cheating is made out. He then submits that so far as other Sections are concerned, they are bailable in nature. On these grounds, he submits
[2026:JHHC:21971] -2-
that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner.
4.
Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State through V.C. has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of using filthy language on the Facebook. On this ground, she submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected.
5.
Considering that the petitioner is a student and recently passed the graduation examination and certain words have been posted against the husband of the informant on the Facebook, which was not dignified and apart from that there is no allegation against the petitioner and further the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and disclosure to that effect has been made in para-11 of the petition and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, above named.
6.
Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Petarwar P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-24.07.2026 Amitesh/-