2026:JHHC:21915 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6574 of 2026 Bablu Kalindi, son of Santosh Kalindi @ Santosh Dom … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nisith Kr. Sahani, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Praful Jojo, APP --- 04/24.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2025 in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No.351 of 2025, registered under Sections 191 (2)/191 (3)/ 190/333/127(1)/127(2)/ 115 (2) / 351 (2) / 352 / 109/ 303 (2) / 324 (4) / 117 (2) and 118 (1) of BNS. Charge has been framed under Sections 191 (2)/127 (2)/115 (2)/117 (2)/118 (2) / 109/ 351 (2), read with Section 190 of B.N.S., corresponding to S.T. Case No.71 of 2026, now pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2025 and earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected at that stage as it was still in the stage of investigation. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the trial is going on and out of 11 charge sheeted witnesses, 5 have already been examined including the informant of the case. He has also submitted that the co-accused namely Bhonda Kalindi @ Bhola Kalindi @ Mohan Kalindi, has been has been enlarged on bail in B.A. No. 5660 of 2026 wherein it was submitted that there was specific allegation of assault against Subhash Kalindi and Jharkhi Kalindi. He submits that the case of the petitioner stands on similar footing as that of Bhola Kalindi. 5. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for 2026:JHHC:21915 2 bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute and no specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner in the F.I.R. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner and the fact that the co- accused has been enlarged on bail, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Bokaro in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No.351 of 2025 corresponding to S.T. Case No.71 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:24.07.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:25.07.2026