Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.1852 of 2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Sudha Sharma
…….Petitioner
Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Petitioner alleges violation of CWP No.11312/2024, titled as Vijay Kumar Versus State of H.P. & Ors. decided along with connected matter on 29.10.2024
2.
It is an admitted position that the “Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024” has been quashed and set aside in CWP No.3361 of 2025, titled as Devinder Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. decided along with connected matters on 25.04.2026. It is also a matter of record that Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).24885/2026, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Devinder Kumar & Ors., decided on 29.07.2026, instituted by the State of Himachal
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
Pradesh against the aforementioned judgment, has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 29.07.2026. While dismissing the appeal, the Hon’ble Apex Court granted four months’ time to the State Government to do the needful in terms of the judgment.
3.
Consequently, in view of above, the present proceedings are closed, at this stage, with direction to the respondents to pass
consideration order, in accordance with the timeline indicated by the Hon’ble Apex Court. The petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, at an appropriate stage, in case necessity so arises in future. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 03, 2026 (sunil)