Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21772 (DEL)

M/S SUNRISE METAL IMPEX v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

W.P.(C)/17557/2024 · 2026-10-07

Anil Kshetarpal, Bharat Parashar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~70 &71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010508822024 + W.P.(C) 11325/2024 & CM APPL. 46935/2024 M/S.SUNRISE METAL IMPEX .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Krishnamohan K Menon & Ms. Prerna Jain Kala, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kushal Kumar, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Tanya Manik,ADV for R-1 Mr. Sumit K. Batra and Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advs. for GNCTD. Ms.Anushrer Narain, SSC with Mr.Apurv Yadav , Adv. ~71 # CNR No. DLHC010953262024 + W.P.(C) 17557/2024 & CM APPL. 74773/2024 M/S SUNRISE METAL IMPEX .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Krishnamohan K Menon & Ms. Prerna Jain Kala, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kushal Kumar, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Tanya Manik,ADV for R-1 Mr. Vedansh Anand, SPC, with Mr. Shivam Kumar (GP), Adv. Mr. Sumit K. Batra and Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Advs. for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHARAT PARASHAR This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:37:47 O R D E R % 07.10.2026 1. With the consent of learned counsel representing the parties, these two Writ Petitions shall stand disposed of 2. In both petitions, though the petitioner has an alternative remedy of appeal, learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that Show Cause Notices do not meet with the requirement of law. 3. In these cases, a counter affidavit as well as additional counter affidavit has been filed by the Respondents. 4. After arguing the matters at length, learned counsel representing the parties have arrived at a consensus and jointly submit that the impugned orders may be set aside and the matters remitted back to the original authority to pass fresh order in accordance with law. 5. The Respondents shall be at liberty to amend Show Cause Notice or issue a corrigendum. The Petitioner shall be entitled to file a response thereto, whereafter the Adjudicating Authority shall proceed to decide the matter afresh. 6. The Petitioner, through his counsel, is directed to appear before the Adjudicating Authority on 13.10.2026 at 11:00 AM. 7. It is expected that the Adjudicating Authority shall decide the matter finally within a period of six months from the date of appearance. 8. With the aforesaid directions and observations, the petitions, along with pending applications, stands disposed of. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J BHARAT PARASHAR, J OCTOBER 7, 2026/DH/MN This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:37:47