Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21770 (AP)

P.SAILAJA v. STATE OF AP

CRLP/5118/2021 · 2026-02-18

Y Lakshmana Rao

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010316872021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5118/2021 Between: 1.P.SAILAJA, W/O P KRISHNA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS OCC.HOUSE WIFE R/O 1-9-295/32/5FLOT NO.202, SITARAMA NILAYAM STREET NO.7 MASID LANE VIDYANAGAR,MUSEERABAD, NEW NALLAKUNTA - HYDERABAD-44 TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.STATE OF AP, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P AT AMARAVATI THROUGH SHO WOMEN POLICE STATION VISAKHAPATNAM CITY VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 2.PILLALA ROSHINI, W/O DILEEP KUMAR, R/O D.NO.32-10-16 GAJUWAKA, VENKATESWARA COLONY VISAKHAPATNAM CITY VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioner. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the case has become settled before the Lok Adalath. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 19.02.2026 VTS