Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 7042 of 2026 Janaki Pathak ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA Mr. J.K. Mohanty, Advocate (Opp. Party No. 4) CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 06.04.2026 Order No. 02 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. It is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the Parties that the impugned order is an appealable one. 4. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. However, it is open for the Petitioner to move the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 5. However, considering the submission made that in terms of the impugned order Petitioner has been held liable to pay certain amount, it is observed that while filing the appeal along with any Interim Application, the appropriate authority/court shall consider the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha