MUNESHWAR GANJHU ALIAS VIKRAM JI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./2089/2026 · 2026-07-24
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21763 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21763 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:21949 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2089 of 2026
------ Muneshwar Ganjhu @ Vikram Ji, aged about 21 years, son of Amrit Ganjhu, resident of Village Patal (Damaru), P.O. and P.S.-Keredari, District-Hazaribag
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Avilash Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 24.07.2026
Heard the parties.
This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioner for restoration of B.A. No. 658 of 2026 to its original file.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that B.A. No. 658 of 2026 was rejected as not pressed. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence and mistake, the counsel for the petitioner could not mark the case in the cause list hence, he could not appear before this Court when the case was called out and the same resulted in dismissal of B.A. No. 658 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said B.A. No. 658 of 2026 and unless B.A. No. 658 of 2026 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that B.A. No. 658 of 2026 be restored to its original file.
Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the facts of this case, B.A. No. 658 of 2026 is restored to its original file to the stage at which it was, before its dismissal.
List B.A. No. 658 of 2026 under the appropriate heading before the appropriate bench after a week.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
24.07.2026 Gunjan-