1 APHC010305632023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3395/2023 Between: 1. M/S SRI KANAKA DURGA CONSTRUCTIONS,, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT D.NO. 3-126, MANDAPAKA ROAD, PYDIPARRU VILLAGE, TANUKU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, A.DURGA PRASAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI GOPAL KRISHNA DWIVEDI, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PRASANNA VENKATESH, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT AT ELURU 3. M BALA RAMA RAJU, THE THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH RAJ OFFICER, PIU, ELURU DISTRICT AT ELURU 4. SRI G CHANDRA BHASKAR REDDY, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYATH RAJ CIRCLE, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. SRI S S RAWATH, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 2 REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the contemnors for will fully deliberately violating the final orders of this Hon'ble Court dt. 02.01.2023 of W.P.No.40597/2022 in the interest of Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the order Hon'ble Court dt.02.01.2023 of W.P.No.40597/2022 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M P V N V SASTRI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. S NISCHALA REDDY 2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI 3. OMKAR D The Court made the following: ORDER: On 18.03.2026, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contemnor, on instructions submitted that the order dated 02.01.2023, 3 passed by this Court in W.P.No.40597 of 2022 have been complied with. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner requested time to get the instructions from his client and hence, the matter was directed to be posted to today. But, today there is no representation for the petitioner to press the contempt case. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh contempt case, if still there is any grievance in the matter. No order as cots. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date:01.04.2026 GK 4 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO:3395 of 2023 Dated:01.04.2026 GK