1 909-wp 3974-2016.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3974 OF 2016 Sarika Yuvraj Patil .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Respondents Mr. Swapnil Telang, Advocate i/b Mr. Satej Jadhav, Advocate for Petitioner. Smt. Kalpalata Patil-Bharaswadkar, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Md. Rahan, Advocate h/f Mr. S. S. Kazi, Advocate for Respondent No. 3. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ. DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2026. PER COURT :- 1. The learned advocate for the petitioner informs that, by efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous. Hence, nothing survives in the petition. 2. In view of the same, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. ) P.S.B. 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:1383-DB