2026:JHHC:21973 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6514 of 2026 Shiv Charan Mahato, Son of Shrawan Mahato … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate Mr. Lalit Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Advocate --- 04/24th July 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Ichagarh P.S. Case No. 16 of 2026 for the offence registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(3), 109, 64, 62 of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., Chandil. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics, although there is direct allegation against the petitioner that the the petitioner threw the victim to the ground and tried to commit rape upon her and when she resisted, he caught hold of her neck and started strangulating her with a intention of killing her, due to which she sustained injuries on her face and neck. Thereafter, the victim somehow managed to escape from the place of occurrence. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the direct allegation against the petitioner and also the fact that the impugned order also itself reveals that the victim suffered injuries as stated in the 2026:JHHC:21973 2 FIR itself, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, this bail application is hereby rejected. 5. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e-mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 24.07.2026 Uploaded On: 25.07.2026 Mukul/-