2026:JHHC:21937 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6551 of 2026 Nandini Let @ Nandani Let, Wife of Brindaban Let … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Dubey, Advocate : Mr. Ratish Roshan Upadhayay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Ruby Pandey, APP --- 02/24.07.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 25.05.2026 in connection with Rail Hatia P.S. Case No. 11 of 2025, registered under Sections 318(4), 123, 305(c) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(C) and 66(D) of Information Technology Act, now pending in the court of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is a lady having two children; one is aged about 11 years and other is 3 years old. He submits that one child is school going student and the petitioner is in custody since 25.05.2026. He submits that charge-sheet has been submitted. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner thereafter submits that as per the allegation in the First Information Report, two unknown persons accompanied the informant in the train and offered him some drink and ultimately, mobile and other belongings of the informant were looted. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly there was no lady involved in the aforesaid incident, but so far as the petitioner is concerned, she became an accused as SIM card in her name was found to be used in the stolen mobile. 6. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions 2026:JHHC:21937 2 made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. 7. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has two children to look after and charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Rail Hatia P.S. Case No. 11 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be her close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of her Aadhar Card along with her mobile number before the learned court which she will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:24.07.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:25.07.2026