2026:JHHC:21073 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(L) No. 2832 of 2021 Janta Mazdoor Sangh, through its General Secretary Bachcha Singh, aged about 75 years, Son of Late Chandi Prasad Singh, having registered office at Bharat Singh Building, Katras More, P.O. and P.S.- Jharia, District-Dhanbad. … … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Labour, Employment and Training, Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. - Doranda, District – Ranchi. 2. The Registrar, Trade Union, having its office at Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District – Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Registrar, Trade Union, having its office at Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. 4. The Assistant Labour Commissioner, Dhanbad, having its office at Dhanbad, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District – Dhanbad. 5. Kunti Devi, wife of Late Suryadeo Singh, the then General Secretary, Janta Mazdoor Sangh, resident of Singh Mansion, Saraidhella, P.O. and P.S.- Saraidhella, District-Dhanbad. … … Respondents --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : None For the Respondent No.5 : Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate --- 19/15.07.2026 1. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- “(a) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) particularly a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 16.07.2021 as contained in Annexure-11 passed by the Respondent No. 2, Registrar, Trade Union, whereby in light of the application made by the Respondent No. 5 for registration of the petitioner's Trade Union, petitioner's Trade Union has been registered under the Trade Unions Act; (b) During pendency of the present writ petition, a writ in the nature of mandamus be issued refraining the Respondent No. 5 to act pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 16.07.2021; (c) During pendency of the present writ petition, the operation of the impugned order dated 16.07.2021 may be stayed till the outcome of the present writ application.” 2026:JHHC:21073 2 2. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner as well as for the respondent-State. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.5 is present. 4. The order sheet shows that on 05.05.2026 also nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioner and by way of last indulgence, the matter was adjourned. 5. No advance notice seeking adjournment has been circulated. 6. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 7. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is closed. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 15.07.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-25.07.2026