2026:HHC:37348 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1231 of 2026 In CWP No.5761 of 2026 Decided on: 02.09.2026. ________________________________________________________ Sonam ...Petitioner Versus Sudha Devi & Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioner: Ms. Bheeshamlata, Proxy Counsel, Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2- State. Mr. Ajay Singh, Proxy Counsel Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Director of Rogi Kalyan Samiti. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Heard. 2. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Ajay Singh, Learned Proxy Counsel, under instructions of original counsel Mr. M.L. Sharma, accept and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and respondent No.3, respectively. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:37348 - 2 - 3. Petitioner has come up before this Court, invoking the contempt jurisdiction of this Court against non-compliance of the judgment dated 08.05.2026 [Annexure P-1] passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.5761 of 2026, titled Sonam v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others, wherein respondents were directed to decide the representation [Annexure P-2 in said writ petition] in the light of averments made therein within twelve weeks by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. 4. With the consent of Learned Counsel for the parties, the instant petition is closed with the direction to the respondents/competent authority to decide the representation [Annexure P-2] as mandated in the judgment dated 08.05.2026 [Annexure P-1] within a period of four weeks from today [if not already decided]. In aforesaid terms, the Contempt Petition and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 02, 2026 [Shivender]