Doredla Suresh Kumar v. Rajiv Vidya Mission (Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan)
WP/11820/2013 · 2026-02-03
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21731 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21731 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010313152013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11820/2013 Between:
1. DOREDLA SURESH KUMAR, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 32 YEARS, H.NO. 4-69, MAIN ROAD, KAMBHAM PADU (P), A.
KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PIN 521227
2. KOTCHARLA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. SANJEEVA RAO, AGED 32 YEARS, H.NO. 1-1, KAMBHAM PADU (P), A. KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, PIN 521227
3. PONNAMANENI ANJAIAH, S/O. RAMA CHANDRA RAO, AGED 28 YEARS, BESIDE BRANCH POST OFFICE, MAIN ROAD, VISSANNAPETA (M) KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521215
4. PETLA TRINADHA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,, AGED 35 YEARS, H.NO. 11-64, 6 TAP ROAD, KONDAPALLI - 521228, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SAKAMURI ANIL KUMAR, S/O. S. NASARAIAH, AGED 34 YEARS, H.NO. 6-88, CANAL ROAD, NEAR SIVALAYAM, GANESH NAGAR, GUNTUPALLI, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
6. NANIKALA RAVI KUMAR, S/O. PITCHAIAH, AGED 30 YEARS, H.NO. 3-16, T.T. KOTTURU (P) TIRUVURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
7. KANKATA BABU RAO, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, H.NO. 2-143, NEAR MRO OFFICE, CHATRAI (P), CHATRAI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
2
8. BINTAKURTHI PHANI KUMAR, S/O. RAVI KUMAR, AGED 28 YEARS, H.NO.2-2, SRI HARIPURAM, MUDINEPALLI (M), KRISHNA - 521329
9. CHEEMAKURTHY SAI RAMESH, S/O. SOBHANACHALAPATHI RAO, AGED 27 YEARS, D.NO. 8-19, MAIN ROAD, MYLAVARAM - 521230, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
10. PUSUNURU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. RAMARAO, D.NO- 2-92, AGED 32 YEARS, MAIN ROAD, KOTAI CENTRE, AGIRIPALLI - 521211 AGIRIPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. RAJIV VIDYA MISSION SARVA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTORCUMCHAIRMAN RAJIV VIDYA MISSION, (SSA), KRISHNA DISTRICT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE PROJECT OFFICER RAJIV VIDYA MISSION SSA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM
5. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, (SCHOOL EDUCATION) DEPARTMENT. 6. THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF A.P., HYDERABAD
...RESPONDENT(S):
3
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. CHANDRAIAH SUNKARA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. RAGHU BABU KALAMATA SC For Samagra Siksha
2. G SEENA KUMAR (SC FOR APEWIDC AND RVM SSA
3. GP FOR EDUCATION
4. BHASKAR GORLA The Court made the following:
4
ORDER:-
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners today also. 2.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioners are continuing in service in terms of the interim directions passed by this Court. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed, in terms of the interim directions passed by this Court. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date.04.02.2026 SR