Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2173 (ORI)

CHINMAY SENAPATI v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/8091/2026 · 2026-03-31

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.8091 of 2026 Chinmay Senapati …. Petitioner Mr. N.R. Routray, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 31.03.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition inter alia with the following prayer: - “The petitioner humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the 0pp. Parties, call for records and after hearing both the parties, direct the 0pp. Parties to pay salary/wages for the period from dtd.01.07.2025 to till date and allow him to continue as an Attendant at CHC Sarankul against the existing vacancy.” 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-4 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period. 5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev