Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21728 (JHR)

LAL PRASAD GORAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/1498/2025 · 2026-07-24

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:21958 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1498 of 2025 --- Lal Prasad Gorain, son of Jyotilal Gorain, resident of Village Chikisiya, P.O. & P.S.- Chas(M), District- Bokaro … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Seva Ram Sahu, Circle Officer, Chas Circle, District- Bokaro 3. Prabhas Dutta, D.C.L.R., Chas, District- Bokaro …. … Opp. Parties --- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the O.P. Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, A.C. to S.C.(L&C)-I --- Order No. 04 Dated: 24.07.2026 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding as against the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 alleging willful violation of order dated 24.07.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 2432 of 2025. 2. Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, learned A.C. to S.C.(L&C)-I, refers to order dated 09.07.2026 (Annexure-A to the show cause affidavit dated 21.07.2026) passed by the opposite party no. 3 in Misc. Case (Double Jamabandi) No. 07/2025-26 and submits that after hearing the parties, it has been mentioned in the said order that the dispute in question can only be agitated before the competent civil court. 3. It is thus submitted that the aforesaid order of this Court has now been complied. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that the opposite party no. 3 has already passed a reasoned order on 2026:JHHC:21958 2 09.07.2026, there is no need to further proceed in the present contempt matter. 5. The contempt proceedings as against the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 are hereby dropped. 6. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. 7. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse as permissible under law against the order dated 09.07.2026 passed by the opposite party no. 3. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) July 24, 2026 Ritesh/ Uploaded on 24.07.2026