Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21719 (KAR)

SIVAKUMAR GOVINDARAJAN v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1753/2026 · 2026-06-15

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28894 WP No. 1753 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 1753 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SIVAKUMAR GOVINDARAJAN S/O GOVINDARAJAN AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NO.506, B BLOCK 3RD CROSS, AECS LAYOUT ROAD NEXT TO KANTI SWEETS VTC: MARATHAHALLI PO: DODDANEKKUNDI, DISTRICT: BENGALURU STATE: KARNATAKA PIN CODE: 560 037 ADHAR NO: 4581 5657 3699 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKASH B SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CID SPECIAL UNITS AND ECONOMIC OFFENCES, BANGALORE, REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BANGALORE CITY, REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001 Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28894 WP No. 1753 of 2026 3. INDUSIND BANK LTD REPRESENTED BY, THE BRANCH MANAGER INDUSIND BANK,IFSC: INDB0001454, GF-NO.292, PHOENIX BOULEVARD, 60 FEET ROAD, AECS LAYOUT, KUNDALAHALLI, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SRI. B.M. KUSHALAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I. ISSUE A WRIT OR DIRECTION OR ORDER TO THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER, TO DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT BANK TO DEFREEZE THE BANK ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER BEARING A/C NO.159739400826, IFSC-INDB0001454, MAINTAINED WITH INDUSIND BANK, AECS LAYOUT, KUNDALAHALLI, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA, AND PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO USE AND OPERATE HIS BANK ACCOUNT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28894 WP No. 1753 of 2026 "WHEREFORE the Petitioners pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: I. Issue a Writ or Direction or Order to the Investigating officer, to direct the 3rd Respondent Bank to defreeze the bank account of the bearing Petitioner A/C No.159739400826, IFSC-INDB0001454, maintained with IndusInd Bank, AECS Layout, Kundalahalli. Bengaluru, Karnataka, and permit the Petitioner to use and operate his bank account. II. Grant such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity". 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the entire account of the petitioner maintained with respondent no.3 has been frozen and despite repeated requests, no information has been furnished as regards the reason for such freezing except to state that the freezing of the account has been made as per the instructions received on the NCRP portal. 3. Today, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 has filed a memo enclosing three orders received by the respondent/bank. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28894 WP No. 1753 of 2026 4. A perusal of the memo along with the documents produced indicates that the complaints on 04/08/2023 is for a sum of Rs.5,000/-, on 06.11.2023 is for a sum of Rs.8618/- and on 01.11.2023 is for a sum of Rs.9358.09. Total amount being Rs.22976.09. Such being the case, the bank could have only frozen the account of the petitioner for a sum of Rs. 22,976.09 and not the entire account. 5. In that view of the matter, I pass the following: ORDER (i) Writ petition is partly allowed. (ii) The debit freeze of the account of the petitioner/lien on the account of the petitioner is restricted to a sum of Rs.22,976.09. (iii) Respondent no. 3 is directed to permit the petitioner to operate the bank account in respect of the balance amount. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28894 WP No. 1753 of 2026 (iv) Needless to say, if any further orders are received by respondent no.3 for marking a lien or freezing the account, the bank would be free to act. This order would not come in the way of the bank acting upon those orders. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE brn List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44