Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21710 (JHR)

JAY GOVIND SAH ALIAS JAY GOVIND SAHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3978/2026 · 2026-07-23

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:21793 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3978 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3978 of 2026 ---- Jay Govind Sah @ Jay Govind Saha, aged about 26 years, son of Logen Saha, resident of village – Sahri, PO and PS – Ranga, District - Sahibganj .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Achinto Sen, Advocate ---- 02/23.07.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ranga P.S. Case No.24 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 329(4), 64, 62 and 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Rajmahal. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that false allegations have been made against the petitioner of serious nature of trying to outrage the modesty. He further submits that the husband of the informant has taken Rs.50,000/- from the petitioner and for that only false case has been lodged against the petitioner. He then submits that now good sense has been prevailed and compromise has reached and compromise petition has been filed before learned Sessions Judge, Rajmahal in ABP No.193 of 2026. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer 2026:JHHC:21793 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3978 of 2026 and submits that allegations are there of outraging the modesty. 5. Annexure – 2 is a document which clearly suggests that compromise has taken place and the said was filed before the learned Sessions Judge in ABP No.193 of 2026 and in paragraph No.3 of the said compromise petition Rs.50,000/- has been taken by the husband of the informant is also disclosed. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Rajmahal in connection with Ranga P.S. Case No.24 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 23.07.2026 Sangam/