1 APHC010301342020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19953/2020 Between: 1. CHERUKURI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O.VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGE 50 ADDRESS R/O.PERALI VILLAGE,KARLPALEM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. HOME DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMORAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. S.P. OFFICE, COLLECTORATE PREMISES. GUNTUR CITY. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , DY. S.P. OFFICE, BAPATLA GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KARLAPALEM POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY IT S CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KARLAPALEM, VILLAG AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the in action on the part of the respondent No.2 of the Writ Petition in considering the representation of the petitioner dated 13/17-10-2020 and to issue suitable instruction to the Respondent No.4 Police Station in registering the Crime basing upon the complaint dated 17.01.2020 of the petitioner is therefore highly illegal improper unjust arbitrary and in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Art 14, 16 of the constitution of India and as a consequential direction to direct the office of the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13/17-10-2020 and to issue suitable instruction to the Respondent No 4 Police Station in registering the Crime basing upon the complaint dated 17.01.2020 of the Petitioner and to pass other order(s)….” 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. The case pertains to the year 2020 and is one of the oldest matters pending on the roster. Inspite of sufficient opportunities granted, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. In the result, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 17.02.2026 KMS 3 144 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.19953 of 2020 Date: 17.02.2026 KMS