- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28897 WP No. 17591 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 17591 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: K.B. GIRIJAMMA W/O LATE M.B. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O BASTIHALLI VILLAGE, BHARAMASAGARA HOBLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DISTRICT-577501. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KANTHARAJAPPA M.G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITRADURGA-577501. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHITRADURGA SUB-DIVISION, CHITRADURGA-577501. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, CHITRADURGA TALUK-577501. 4. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, NADAKACHERI, BHARAMASAGARA HOBLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK-577501. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28897 WP No. 17591 of 2026 5. D.O. NAVEENA, S/O Y.B. SATHISH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O BASTIHALLI VILLAGE, HULLEHAL POST, BHARAMASAGARA HOBLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DISTRICT-577501. 6. T. SHASHIKUMARA, S/O LATE M.B. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O BASTIHALLI VILLAGE, HULLEHAL POST, BHARAMASAGARA HOBLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK AND DISTRICT-577501. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, IN THE NATURE OF WRIT, QUASHING ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN. RP.NO.36/2024 DATED 26.11.2025 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F AND ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN RA.NO.322/2023-24 DATED 05.07.2024 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-E CONFORM THE ORDER OF 4TH RESPONDENT IN RRT/VIVADA/C.R/23/22-23 DATED 31.08.2023. PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-C TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28897 WP No. 17591 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. In this petition, petitioner has assailed the order dated 26.11.2025 (Annexure-F) and the order dated 05.07.2024 (Annexure-E), whereby the order dated 31.08.2023 (Annexure-C) has been confirmed. 3. A perusal of the writ petition would indicate that the mutation has been made in terms of a registered Sale Deed dated 30.06.2023. In that view of the matter, I am of the opinion that no interference is called for in this petition as the mutation has been made pursuant to the execution of the registered sale deed. However, it is open for the petitioner to avail any such remedy under law in respect of the aforesaid registered sale deed concerned. 4. With the above observation, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE VBS/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43